I think what was particularly formative for him on the Bill of Rights is the wartime experience where he, on the one hand wanted to be as loyal as possible, and on the other hand became increasingly aware of the great power that the government had aggregated to itself and the way in which that power could be abused. And so, although he was probably as fervent an anti-Communist as anybody who held public office in the 50s and 60s in Canada, he was also, at the same time, from his legal experience I suppose, very, very clear about the rule of Law and the rights of individuals and their place in the legal system. And so, he had this passion about symbolically protecting our rights, and of course, the irony was that to do all of that in a way that really would work, you would have to entrench it in the constitution and he never got to that stage. So there were all the jokes that the Bill of Rights was on a Cornflakes box and how did it really matter because it couldn't apply in other jurisdictions. But it was his passion and it was something that he thought was fundamental.
